MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768671117 · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2017.09.197

Novel Si-CNT/polyaniline nanocomposites as Lithium-ion battery anodes for improved cycling performance

2017· article· en· W2768671117 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Lisong Xiao, Yee Hwa Sehlleier, Sascha Dobrowolny, Falko Mahlendorf, Angelika Heinzel, Christof Schulz, Hartmut Wiggers

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Today Proceedings · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRyerson University
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanocompositeAnodePolyanilineFaraday efficiencyCarbon nanotubeLithium (medication)CoatingLithium-ion batteryNanoparticleNanotechnologySiliconBattery (electricity)Composite materialElectrodePolymerOptoelectronicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel nanocomposite consisting of gas-phased produced Si nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and polyaniline (PANi) is developed as an anode material (Si-CNT/PANi) for lithium-ion batteries. This nanocomposite integrates the merits from its three components, where Si nanoparticles provide high capacity, CNTs act as an electrically conductive and mechanically flexible network, and PANi coating further enhances the electrical conductivity and protects the silicon structure. An anode made of this nanocomposite shows a high reversible capacity of 2430 mAh/g with good capacity retention over 500 cycles compared to pristine Si. The Si-CNT/PANi nanocomposite also demonstrated a high Coulombic efficiency and improved rate-capabilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials Today ProceedingsSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207