MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768702996

Modeling the oxygen depletion within stratified bottom boundary layers of lakes

2016· article· en· W2768702996 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aidin Jabbari, Leon Boegman, Murray Mackay, Nader Nakhaei

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMixed layerBoundary layerStratification (seeds)Bottom waterMixing (physics)OxygenGeologyEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)MechanicsOceanographyGeotechnical engineeringChemistryPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have implemented two bottom boundary layer mixing sub-models in a one-dimensional bulk mixed-layer thermodynamic and dissolved oxygen model to diffuse the effects of the sediment oxygen demand from the bottom boundary condition in small lakes.In the first submodel, bottom mixing is calculated following a mixed layer approach, whereas in the second sub-model the dissolved oxygen flux is computed from Fick's Law.The second sub-model results in better prediction of dissolved oxygen in two small Canadian Shield lakes, compared to the mixed-layer approach.While appropriate for the upper mixed layer, the bottom mixedlayer model produced excessive near-bed mixing.Bottom mixed layer approaches have been successful in large lakes, suggesting a Reynolds number dependence for mixed-layer development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFrench-language works237,207