MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768719416 · doi:10.1093/jee/tox296

Baseline Susceptibility of Striacosta albicosta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Ontario, Canada to Vip3A Bacillus thuringiensis Protein

2017· article· en· W2768719416 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Yasmine Farhan, Jocelyn L Smith, A. W. Schaafsma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Economic Entomology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersMitacs
KeywordsBiologyNoctuidaeLepidoptera genitaliaBacillus thuringiensisPEST analysisPopulationGenetically modified maizeBotanyGenetically modified cropsGeneticsGeneBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Striacosta albicosta (Smith; Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a pest of corn (Zea mays L.), which has recently expanded its range into Ontario, Canada. Genetically modified corn expressing Vip3A insecticidal protein from Bacillus thuringiensis is a biotechnological option for the control of S. albicosta. To support an insect resistance management program, we conducted a study of baseline susceptibility of 10-field collected S. albicosta populations in Ontario, Canada to Vip3A before widespread commercial adoption. Neonates were exposed to artificial diet overlaid with Vip3A. The LC50 ranged from 22.7 to 53.5 ng Vip3A cm-2. The EC50 ranged from 11.4 to 30.2 ng Vip3A cm-2. There was low inter-population variation in susceptibility to Vip3A, which we believe represents the natural geographical variation in response and not variation caused by previous exposure to selection pressure of the Vip3A protein.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Economic EntomologySame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207