MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768797272 · doi:10.1145/3105925

CaffePresso

2017· article· en· W2768797272 on OpenAlexaff
Gopalakrishna Hegde, Siddhartha Siddhartha, Nachiket Kapre

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNvidia
KeywordsComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayEmbedded systemClass (philosophy)Digital signal processingDeep learningKernel (algebra)Range (aeronautics)InferenceComputer architectureDeep neural networksArtificial neural networkComputer engineeringComputer hardwareArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Auto-tuning and parametric implementation of deep learning kernels allow off-the-shelf accelerator-based embedded platforms to deliver high-performance and energy-efficient mappings of the inference phase of lightweight neural networks. Low-complexity classifiers are characterized by operations on small image maps with two to three deep layers and few class labels. For these use cases, we consider a range of embedded systems with 20W power budgets such as the Xilinx ZC706 (FPGA), NVIDIA Jetson TX1 (GPU), TI Keystone II (DSP), and Adapteva Parallella (RISC+NoC). In CaffePresso, we combine auto-tuning of the implementation parameters, and platform-specific constraints deliver optimized solutions for each input ConvNet specification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0860.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Embedded Computing SystemsSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207