MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768826958 · doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.131

Hematobiochemical Alterations and Therapeutic Management of Puerperal Tetany in Bitch

2017· article· en· W2768826958 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sheikh Tajamul Islam, Mohd Younis Ganaie, Rayeesa Ali, Syed Shakeebah Kubra, Anand Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicComparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTetanyAtaxiaAnorexiaLitterLamenessAnesthesiaInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Pomeranian female dog four year old weighing 10 kg with litter size 5 puppies of Labrador mix, was presented to Sanjay Gandhi Animal Care Centre (SGACC) Rajouri garden New Delhi, India, with history of whelped 7 days back, lameness, hyperthermia, anorexia and restlessness. Clinical examination revealed pyrexia (104.8ËšF), tachyponea (50 breaths/min), tachycardia (105 beats per minute), congested mucous membrane, hind limb muscle twitching, severe panting, ataxia and stiffness. The case was tentatively diagnosed as eclampsia on the basis of history and clinical signs which was later confirmed by hematology and electrolyte analysis. History also revealed that the main predisposing factors which cause eclampsia in dogs are poor management, poor nutrition, excessive milk production, increased litter size. The bitch was treated with, intravenous 10 ml of 10% Calcium gluconate and Belladonna-30 orally along with supportive therapy which shows positive response to treatment and uneventful recovery 3 days after treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied SciencesSame topicComparative Animal Anatomy StudiesFrench-language works237,207