Clogging of pervious concrete pile caused by soil piping: an approximate experimental study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to their high permeability and high strength, pervious concrete piles (PCPs) can improve ground bearing capacity. However, clogging of pervious concrete in practice is a potential disadvantage. To investigate the clogging mechanism of PCPs due to sand piping, a series of laboratory simulation tests is conducted on a developed hydraulic conductivity test system. This testing demonstrates the effects of pervious concrete porosity, grading of fine movable particles, mix ratio of skeleton particles to movable particles, relative density of soil, and distance between PCPs on PCP clogging. The experimental test results show that the hydraulic conductivity of PCP decreases for approximately 70 min and then becomes relatively stable. In addition, it is observed that PCP clogging rarely occurs in cases of low pervious concrete porosity, small movable sand particle size, high sand relative density, and large pile distance. The results also show that measurement of electrical conductivity can be an alternative method of hydraulic conductivity measurement. Based on the test results, preliminary clogging models are proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".