The Endosomal Protein Endotubin Is Required for Enterocyte Differentiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: During late embryonic development and through weaning, enterocytes of the ileum are highly endocytic. Defects in endocytosis and trafficking are implicated in neonatal disease, however, the mechanisms regulating trafficking during the developmental period are incompletely understood. The apical endosomal protein endotubin (EDTB) is highly expressed in the late embryonic and neonatal ileum. In epithelial cells in vitro, EDTB regulates both trafficking of tight junction proteins and proliferation through modulation of YAP activity. However, EDTB function during the endocytic stage of development of the intestine is unknown. METHODS: By using Villin-CreERT2, we induced knockout of EDTB during late gestation and analyzed the impact on endocytic compartments and enterocyte structure in neonates using immunofluorescence, immunocytochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy. RESULTS: Deletion of the apical endosomal protein EDTB in the small intestine during development impairs enterocyte morphogenesis, including loss of the apical endocytic complex, defective formation of the lysosomal compartment, and some cells had large microvillus-rich inclusions similar to those observed in microvillus inclusion disease. There also was a decrease in apical endocytosis and mislocalization of proteins involved in apical trafficking. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that EDTB-mediated trafficking within the epithelial cells of the developing ileum is important for maintenance of endocytic compartments and enterocyte integrity during early stages of gut development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".