MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768923404 · doi:10.3905/jwm.2012.15.3.105

BOOK REVIEW

2012· article· en· W2768923404 on OpenAlexaff
Greg N. Gregoriou, Donald M. DePamphilis

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œjournal of wealth management · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicInsurance and Financial Risk Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJargonBusinessLeveraged buyoutPrivate equityRecapitalizationEquity (law)Asset (computer security)CashStatutory lawFinanceMonetary economicsEconomicsLawPolitical scienceComputer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

All disciplines have their own jargon intended to promote accurate communication. Deal making is no exception. Forward and reverse triangular mergers, backend mergers, cash-out statutory mergers, asset purchases, and leveraged buyouts are just a few of the terms used to describe deal structures. Firms undergoing significant downsizing may engage in spin-offs, split-offs, and equity carve-outs. Firms attempting to discourage unwanted suitors may implement staggered board elections and dual class recapitalizations. Investment bankers routinely talk about enterprise values and multiples in estimating values for target firms. Although these terms are meaningful to some, they often are bewildering to others. <b>TOPIC:</b>Private equity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œjournal of wealth managementSame topicInsurance and Financial Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207