MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768934089 · doi:10.1109/lcn.2017.68

Wireless Positioning Sensor Network Integrated with Cloud for Industrial Automation

2017· article· en· W2768934089 on OpenAlexaff
S. M. Kamruzzaman, Muhammad Jaseemuddin, Xavier Fernando, Peyman Moeini

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkComputer scienceAutomationScalabilityReal-time computingCloud computingReliability (semiconductor)WirelessRedundancy (engineering)Embedded systemEngineeringComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automation of modern industrial plants require real-time tracking of object locations and sensing of local and ambient parameters for variety of applications such as counting and tracking of objects in assembly line, detection and positioning of failures of machines etc. Mostly, discrete Real Time Location System (RTLS) performs object tracking in existing industrial automation without its integration with the sensing and control network, which constrains application's responsiveness. In this paper, we propose an integrated solution of Wireless Positioning Sensor Network (WPSN) that is designed for accuracy, reliability, scalability and optimal network operation. The proposed WPSN is applicable for harsh indoor industrial environments for not only monitoring and control of plant operations but also for identification, localization and tracking of assets and inventory in industrial warehouses. The indoor industrial environment poses challenging conditions for radio signal propagation that adversely affects reliability of communication of sensing and location data. We approach reliability by incorporating redundancy and making our network reconfigurable through adaptive intelligent learning process. We employ adaptive clustering technique to address the need of scalable deployment for varied industrial scenarios. We include hybrid localization scheme to provide high precision positioning but with fallback reduced precision operation to deal with long-term channel impairment. The WPSN is connected with backend cloud infrastructure for low cost monitoring and control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207