MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768935491 · doi:10.55504/0884-9153.1168

Students' Attitudes Toward Debt-A Study of Atkinson Faculty of Liberal and Professional Studies, York University, and Ryerson University

2001· article· en· W2768935491 on OpenAlex
Stephen Bell, J. Paul Grayson, Susan Stowe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Student Financial Aid · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Research Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDebtHigher educationNoticeStudent debtNorm (philosophy)PsychologySociologyPolitical sciencePublic relationsFinanceEconomicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Ontario, the university system has been put on notice that there will be financial consequences for those universities whose Ontario Student Assistance Plan (OSAP) default rates are greater than the norm. As a result, it is important to determine all of the factors that affect students' decisions to borrow. This paper uses survey information gathered from Atkinson Faculty of Liberal and Professional Studies, York University, and Ryerson University to focus attention on the relationship between students' attitudes toward going into debt to finance their university education and their actual borrowing behavior. The study found that when all else is held constant, students with positive attitudes toward debt are more likely than others to be on the OSAP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it