MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768936014 · doi:10.4153/cmb-2018-027-x

Irreducible Polynomials Over a Finite Field with Restricted Coefficients

2018· article· en· W2768936014 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sam Porritt

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsMathematicsFinite fieldField (mathematics)Degree (music)Function fieldFunction (biology)CombinatoricsPure mathematicsDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We prove a function field analogue of Maynard’s celebrated result about primes with restricted digits. That is, for certain ranges of parameters $n$ and $q$ , we prove an asymptotic formula for the number of irreducible polynomials of degree $n$ over a finite field $\mathbb{F}_{q}$ whose coefficients are restricted to lie in a given subset of $\mathbb{F}_{q}$ .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Mathematical BulletinSame topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207