MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768994473 · doi:10.7202/1041840ar

Interprétations psychanalytiques du traumatisme : une synthèse théorico-clinique

2017· article· fr· W2768994473 on OpenAlexaffvenue
David Smolak, Louis Brunet

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de psychologie · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De plus en plus, on tend à reconnaître la spécificité du travail clinique effectué auprès de victimes de traumatismes. Dans le contexte actuel d’accueil des réfugiés syriens, nombreux sont les soignants qui auront à prendre en charge des survivants de situations extrêmes. Ainsi, l’article qui suit propose une synthèse théorico-clinique de quelques grands courants (Freud, Ferenczi, Winnicott, Bokanowski, Roussillon) et concepts (fonction contenante, médium malléable) psychanalytiques, dans l’objectif d’apporter un nouvel éclairage sur le phénomène du traumatisme et de fournir des repères aux aidants pour les soutenir dans leurs futurs efforts de mise en sens de cette expérience irreprésentable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de psychologieSame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207