MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769000533 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.170498

Delivering more equitable primary health care in Northern Canada

2017· article· en· W2769000533 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
T. Kue Young, Susan Chatwood

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Circumpolar Health ResearchPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPrimary carePrimary health careKey (lock)SustainabilityPolitical scienceHealth careHealth care reformMedicinePublic administrationHealth policyFamily medicineComputer scienceLawComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY POINTS Primary care has featured prominently in national debates on what ails the Canadian health care system and what holds the key to its sustainability. Most jurisdictions in Canada have attempted primary care reform in recent years,[1][1] but reference to Northern Canada is conspicuously

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0170.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2017
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207