Justiciability of Children’s Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Botswana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Children are a vulnerable group, hence, they need special protection. This is provided through ratifying children-protecting instruments; e.g., Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (ACRWC). Botswana acceded to the CRC and ACRWC in 1995 and 2001 respectively. Beyond ratification and domestication of these instruments, rights must be asserted through justiciability mechanisms, or else, they remain paper rights. Amongst others, justiciability is effected through state reports. Using a mixed methods approach, this study investigated the question; ‘is Botswana complying with her reporting obligations?’ It concluded that she was in breach and, thus, fails to respect, protect and fulfil children’s economic, social and cultural rights. This position contradicts claims that Botswana is children-friendly as stated by publications such as The African Report on Child Wellbeing. However, Botswana can redeem herself by reporting on what she is doing for children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".