MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769124842 · doi:10.1353/llt.2017.0055

Consumers in the Bush: Shopping in Rural Upper Canada by Douglas McCalla

2017· article· en· W2769124842 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Michael C. Bumsted

Bibliographic record

VenueLabour / Le Travail · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWildernessConsumption (sociology)CarvingNarrativeImmigrationPeriod (music)SociologyMedia studiesPolitical scienceHistorySocial scienceLawArtAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Consumers in the Bush: Shopping in Rural Upper Canada by Douglas McCalla Michael C. Bumsted Douglas McCalla, Consumers in the Bush: Shopping in Rural Upper Canada (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press 2015) For many, the overwhelming image of immigrants to Canada is one of hardship. Whether it be as actors in the fur trade, or as pioneering farmers, the idea of carving a life for oneself and one's family out of the wilderness was one that involved limited material resources, and was based mostly on the self-sufficiency of the household. While the academy has, to some extent, moved past the Laura Ingalls Wilder inspired narrative, this data-rich study not only reinforces the idea that people bought things, and that those things came from stores, but it also undertakes to unpack the accounts of those making the purchases. In doing so, the study builds a framework for a much more nuanced understanding of Upper Canadian consumption patterns, and does so in a way that allows for future comparisons. While such a study is not a groundbreaking concept, as McCalla himself outlines in his assessment of the literature, it is new to learn more about the details of Upper Canadian consumption in this period. Filling a hole in the data regarding material consumption in the Atlantic World, it builds on other work to look at the origins of European material culture in a period of transition between 1808 and 1861, in which the majority of the world was moving towards a more conspicuous form of consumption. The study itself is well organised, with each chapter breaking down a specific collection of goods, beginning with textiles, and moving through the wide range of goods available at general stores. By looking at the sales accounts, and not at importations, the study constructs a model of not just what was available to consumers in rural Upper Canada, but also what they actually bought. In doing so, it not only addresses larger arguments in related fields about consumption practices, but provides specific insight into the circumstances of these particular communities. As a result, McCalla is able to confirm the continued establishment of sugar, tea, and coffee as staple goods rather than luxury ones. He is also able to engage in a brief discussion of the issue of survivability of material culture as a barrier to certain forms of archaeological evidence in regards to cotton products versus homespun. He unlocks the idea of consumer choice, even for those in these rural communities, as well as reinforcing the commonality of the extension of store credit. By illuminating that goods for sale were priced, and not simply bartered for, the rural general store is framed to look much like it would have in other Atlantic World contexts, and not as a place of barter. In fact, that services provided in payment were given cash values [End Page 314] in the accounts goes to further prove that even in these remote communities, currency was being used as it was in more established centres. The study also does an excellent job of challenging the concept of the self-sufficient pioneer household and provides a more nuanced view of the economy of home production at this time. In looking at the purchasing of candles and nails, McCalla proves that consumers in this study, even though capable of making these goods for themselves, would allocate their time and energy resources to other avenues, and buy these things, rather than make them, as some narrative sources suggest. The modest purchase of gunpowder shown in this study also suggests that the narrative surrounding pioneers hunting most of the winter is inaccurate, or, at the very least, not present in this sample. Showing how many local goods were available for purchase in the general store also proved to be a fascinating detail in the economy of the towns in question. That even the artisans of the communities, like the shoemaker, would have their goods available for sale at the general store displayed both the importance of the stores themselves to the communities, but also that the commerce of this period did not operate in a way that was outside...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLabour / Le TravailSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207