Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Rare Earth Elements from Nickel Metal Hydride Battery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Today’s world relies upon critical green technologies that are made of elements with unique properties irreplaceable by other materials. Such elements are classified under strategic materials; examples include rare earth elements that are in increasingly high demand but facing supply uncertainty and near zero recycling. For tackling the sustainability challenges associated with rare earth elements supply, new strategies have been initiated to mine these elements from secondary sources. Waste electrical and electronic equipment contain considerable amounts of rare earth elements; however, the current level of their recycling is less than 1%. Current recycling practices use either pyrometallurgy, which is energy intensive, or hydrometallurgy that rely on large volumes of acids and organic solvents, generating large volumes of environmentally unsafe residues. This study put emphasis on developing an innovative and sustainable process for the urban mining of rare earth elements from waste electrical and electronic equipment, in particular, a nickel metal hydride battery. The developed process relies on supercritical fluid extraction utilizing CO 2 as the solvent, which is inert, safe, and abundant. This process is very efficient in the sense that it is safe, runs at low temperature, and does not produce hazardous waste while recovering ∼90% of rare earth elements. Furthermore, we propose a mechanism for the supercritical fluid extraction of rare earth elements, where we considered a trivalent rare earth element state bonded with three tri- n -butyl phosphate molecules and three nitrates model for the extracted rare earth tri- n -butyl phosphate complex. The supercritical fluid extraction process has the double advantage of waste valorization without utilizing hazardous reagents, thus minimizing the negative impacts of process tailings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it