MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769151019 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2017.2778429

Improved High-Frequency Voltage Injection Based Permanent Magnet Temperature Estimation for PMSM Condition Monitoring for EV Applications

2017· article· en· W2769151019 on OpenAlexaff
Guodong Feng, Chunyan Lai, K. Lakshmi Varaha Iyer, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltageInverterMagnetControl theory (sociology)Coupling (piping)Nonlinear systemTemperature measurementMaterials scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permanent magnet (PM) temperature is critical to ensure high-performance and reliable control of permanent magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs) for electric vehicle (EV) applications. High-frequency (HF) voltage injection based approach has been shown to be capable of PM temperature estimation under all-speed range with simple implementation. This paper improves existing HF voltage injection based PM temperature estimation approach by considering the cross-coupling effect. The key to PM temperature estimation is the temperature-dependent HF resistance estimated from the injected HF voltage and the current response. It is found that the cross-coupling effect has a great influence on the HF resistance estimation. This paper firstly improves the HF voltage injection model by considering the cross-coupling effect. Then, a comparative numerical investigation is conducted to analyze the estimation errors induced by the cross-coupling effect. A novel HF resistance estimation approach is derived from the proposed improved model and the PM temperature is calculated from the HF resistance with a linear thermal model. The influence of inverter nonlinearity is also analyzed. Experimental investigations demonstrate that the proposed approach is able to improve the performance of PM temperature estimation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207