MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769209600 · doi:10.1109/sips.2017.8110014

Reduced-memory high-throughput fast-SSC polar code decoder architecture

2017· article· en· W2769209600 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolar codeComputer scienceThroughputDecoding methodsLatency (audio)PolarParallel computingComputer hardwareEmbedded systemWirelessAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polar codes have been selected for use within 5G networks, and are being considered for data and control channel for additional 5G scenarios, like the next generation ultra reliable low latency channel. As a result, efficient fast polar code decoder implementations are essential. In this work, we present a new fast simplified successive cancellation (Fast-SSC) decoder architecture. Our proposed solution is able to reduce the memory requirements and has an improved throughput with respect to state of the art Fast-SSC decoders. We achieve these objectives through a more efficient memory utilization than that of Fast-SSC, which also enables to execute multiple instructions in a single clock cycle. Our work shows that, compared to the state of the art, memory requirements are reduced by 22.2%; at the same time, a throughput improvement of 11.6% is achieved with (1024, 512) polar codes. Comparing equal throughputs, the memory requirements are reduced by up to 60.4%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207