MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769282422 · doi:10.1080/25726668.2019.1577596

Responding to new information in a mining complex: fast mechanisms using machine learning

2019· article· en· W2769282422 on OpenAlexafffund
Cosmin Păduraru, Roussos Dimitrakopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueMining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersAngloGold AshantiVale Canada LimitedNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNewmont CorporationBHP BillitonCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaBarrick Gold Corporation
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As more and more data about mining complex operations are collected and stored, it becomes increasingly important for computer systems to help human operators make better, more informed decisions. This can be done indirectly, through improved visualization or prediction, or directly by suggesting decisions that respond to new information. This paper contributes to the direct approach by showing how state-of-the-art data-driven decision making can be used for optimizing material flows in a large mining complex. To this end, a combination of neural networks and policy gradient reinforcement learning is used for computing material destination decisions that automatically respond to new information. Results using a computational model of a large copper mining complex show that the proposed method significantly outperforms an optimized cut-off grade policy similar to the one currently used at the mine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMining Technology Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and MetallurgySame topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207