Accurate prediction and elucidation of drug resistance based on the robust and reproducible chemoresponse communities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Selecting the available treatment for each cancer patient from genomic context is a core goal of precision medicine, but innovative approaches with mechanism interpretation and improved performance are still highly needed. Through utilizing in vitro chemotherapy response data coupled with gene and miRNA expression profiles, we applied a network-based approach that identified markers not as individual molecules but as functional groups extracted from the integrated transcription factor and miRNA regulatory network. Based on the identified chemoresponse communities, the predictors of drug resistance achieved high accuracy in cross-validation and were more robust and reproducible than conventional single-molecule markers. Meanwhile, as candidate communities not only enriched abundant cellular process but also covered a variety of drug enzymes, transporters, and targets, these resulting chemoresponse communities furnished novel models to interpret multiple kinds of potential regulatory mechanism, such as dysregulation of cancer cell apoptosis or disturbance of drug metabolism. Moreover, compounds were linked based on the enrichment of their common chemoresponse communities to uncover undetected response patterns and possible multidrug resistance phenotype. Finally, an omnibus repository named ChemoCommunity (http://www.jianglab.cn/ChemoCommunity/) was constructed, which furnished a user-friendly interface for a convenient retrieval of the detailed information on chemoresponse communities. Taken together, our method, and the accompanying database, improved the performance of classifiers for drug resistance and provided novel model to uncover the possible regulatory mechanism of individual response to drug.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".