MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769452166 · doi:10.5430/jms.v8n5p86

The Impact of Electronic Management on the Employees' Performance Field Study on the Public Organizations and Governance in Jerash Governorate

2017· article· en· W2769452166 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Khaled Adnan Bataineh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Management and Strategy · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOrganizational Leadership and Management Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate governanceBusinessOrder (exchange)Variable (mathematics)PopulationKnowledge managementField (mathematics)Service (business)Public relationsProcess managementMarketingComputer sciencePolitical scienceMedicineMathematicsEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study aimed at knowing the impact of Electronic management on the employees' performance- a field study that was applied on the public organization in Jerash Governorate, the researcher followed the descriptive analytical approach, then analyze the relationship between the independent variable (Electronic management) and the dependent variable (employees' performance), aiming at knowing the impact of the independent variable on the dependent variable. In order to achieve the study goal, a 24 paragraphs questionnaire was developed to gather the initial information from the study population, and then analyze these information using SPSS V 22. The study found that the requirements of Electronic management are available in the public governance in Jerash, and the results showed a significant positive relationship between all dimensions of Electronic management and employees' performance. The study provided a group of recommendations to speed up adopting the electronic management in the public governance in Jordan specially in Jerash; one of the most important recommendations was the continuous follow up on applying the concepts of Electronic management in the different public, private, and service governance in order to keep up with the challenges and development and focus on accessibility and globalization and providing the possible services, within a comprehensive functional model to satisfy the widest slice of the community as soon as possible and in the least cost possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Management and StrategySame topicOrganizational Leadership and Management StrategiesFrench-language works237,207