MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769502403 · doi:10.1109/infcomw.2017.8116363

Energy-efficient resource allocation in software-defined mobile networks with mobile edge computing and caching

2017· article· en· W2769502403 on OpenAlexafffund
Chengchao Liang, Ying He, F. Richard Yu, Nan Zhao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad
KeywordsComputer scienceProvisioningMobile edge computingComputer networkBase stationDistributed computingBandwidth allocationBackhaul (telecommunications)Resource allocationBandwidth (computing)Radio access networkOptimization problemMobile computingServerMobile station

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the energy-efficient resource allocation in software-defined mobile networks with mobile edge computing and caching. With the introduction of caching and computing functions in mobile networks, content sources need to be selected according to the distribution of contents in caches, the capability of computational resources and the status of networks. Moreover, the network needs to provision bandwidth on each link for data flows from the source to the destination by allocating backhaul and radio resources. In this framework, we formulate a novel optimization problem to jointly consider bandwidth provisioning and content source selection. To solve this problem efficiently, firstly the content source selection problem is decoupled from the bandwidth provisioning problem by deploying dual-decomposition method. Additionally, based on alternating direction method of multipliers, we develop decentralized schemes to solve the decoupled problems across links and base stations coordinated by a central controller. Simulation results are presented to show the performance of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207