MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769510466 · doi:10.7202/1041844ar

Le sommeil des adolescents québécois et la problématique suicidaire : des liens à faire ?

2017· article· fr· W2769510466 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Karyne Pépin, Sophie Desjardins

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de psychologie · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Après les accidents de véhicules divers, le suicide s’avère la deuxième cause de mortalité au Québec chez les adolescents de 15 à 19 ans. De plus en plus d’études indiquent qu’en plus de constituer des signaux d’alarme, les problèmes de sommeil chez les jeunes pourraient contribuer à la problématique suicidaire. Le présent article dresse un portrait du suicide chez les adolescents québécois, quantifie les besoins des jeunes en matière de sommeil et aborde les deux problèmes de sommeil les plus fréquents auprès de cette population, soit l’insomnie et le syndrome de délai de phase. Il présente ensuite les causes et les conséquences de ces difficultés de sommeil et explique les liens unissant ces dernières à la problématique suicidaire. Des recommandations s’adressant tant aux jeunes, aux parents, aux professionnels qu’aux institutions sont finalement effectuées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de psychologieSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207