MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769548074 · doi:10.1128/aem.02164-17

High Prevalence and Genetic Diversity of Large phiCD211 (phiCDIF1296T)-Like Prophages in Clostridioides difficile

2017· article· en· W2769548074 on OpenAlexafffund
Julian R. Garneau, Ognjen Sekulović, Bruno Dupuy, Olga Soutourina, Marc Monot, Louis‐Charles Fortier

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied and Environmental Microbiology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersAgence Nationale de la RechercheNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsProphageBiologyGeneticsGenomeTransposaseGeneMobile genetic elementsLysogenic cycleComparative genomicsLocus (genetics)BacteriophageGenomicsTransposable elementEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Clostridioides difficile (formerly Clostridium difficile ) is a pathogenic bacterium displaying great genetic diversity. A significant proportion of this diversity is due to the presence of integrated prophages. Here, we provide an in-depth analysis of phiCD211, also known as phiCDIF1296T, the largest phage identified in C. difficile so far, with a genome of 131 kbp. It shares morphological and genomic similarity with other large siphophages, like phage 949, infecting Lactococcus lactis , and phage c-st, infecting Clostridium botulinum . A PhageTerm analysis indicated the presence of 378-bp direct terminal repeats at the phiCD211 genome termini. Among striking features of phiCD211, the presence of several transposase and integrase genes suggests past recombination events with other mobile genetic elements. Several gene products potentially influence the bacterial lifestyle and fitness, including a putative AcrB/AcrD/AcrF multidrug resistance protein, an EzrA septation ring formation regulator, and a spore protease. We also identified a CRISPR locus and a cas3 gene. We screened 2,584 C. difficile genomes available and detected 149 prophages sharing ≥80% nucleotide identity with phiCD211 (5% prevalence). Overall, phiCD211-like phages were detected in C. difficile strains corresponding to 21 different multilocus sequence type groups, showing their high prevalence. Comparative genomic analyses revealed the existence of several clusters of highly similar phiCD211-like phages. Of note, large chromosome inversions were observed in some members, as well as multiple gene insertions and module exchanges. This highlights the great plasticity and gene coding potential of the phiCD211/phiCDIF1296T genome. Our analyses also suggest active evolution involving recombination with other mobile genetic elements. IMPORTANCE Clostridioides difficile is a clinically important pathogen representing a serious threat to human health. Our hypothesis is that genetic differences between strains caused by the presence of integrated prophages could explain the apparent differences observed in the virulence of different C. difficile strains. In this study, we provide a full characterization of phiCD211, also known as phiCDIF1296T, the largest phage known to infect C. difficile so far. Screening 2,584 C. difficile genomes revealed the presence of highly similar phiCD211-like phages in 5% of the strains analyzed, showing their high prevalence. Multiple-genome comparisons suggest that evolution of the phiCD211-like phage community is dynamic, and some members have acquired genes that could influence bacterial biology and fitness. Our study further supports the relevance of studying phages in C. difficile to better understand the epidemiology of this clinically important human pathogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied and Environmental MicrobiologySame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207