<i>Ab initio</i> calculation of the calorimetric electron-capture spectrum of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Ho</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>163</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>: Intra-atomic decay into bound states
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The determination of the electron neutrino mass by electron capture in $^{163}\mathrm{Ho}$ relies on a precise understanding of the deexcitation of a core hole after an electron-capture event. Here we present an ab initio calculation of the electron-capture spectrum of $^{163}\mathrm{Ho}$, i.e., the $^{163}\mathrm{Ho}$ decay rate as a function of the energy distribution between the $^{163}\mathrm{Dy}$ daughter atom and the neutrino. Our current level of theory includes all intra-atomic decay channels and many-body interactions on a basis of fully relativistic bound orbitals. We use theoretical methods developed and extensively used for the calculation of core level spectroscopy on correlated electron materials. Our comparison to experimental electron-capture data critically tests the accuracy of these theories. We find that relativistic interactions beyond the Dirac equation lead to only minor shifts of the spectral peaks. The electronic relaxation after an electron-capture event due to the modified nuclear potential leads to a mixing of different edges, but, due to conservation of angular momentum of each scattered electron, no additional structures emerge. Many-body Coulomb interactions lead to the formation of multiplets and to additional peaks corresponding to multiple core holes created via Auger decay. Multiplets crucially change the appearance of the resonances on a Rydberg energy scale. The additional structures due to Auger decay are, although clearly visible, relatively weak compared to the single core hole states and are incidentally far away from the end-point region of the spectrum. As the end point of the spectrum is affected most by the neutrino mass, these additional states do not directly influence the statistics for determining the neutrino mass. The multiplet broadening and Auger shake-up of the main core-level edges do, however, change the apparent linewidth and accompanying lifetime of these edges. Fitting core-level edges, either in electron-capture spectroscopy or in x-ray absorption spectroscopy, by a single resonance thus leads to an underestimation of the core hole lifetime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".