United Mexican States <i>v.</i> British Columbia (Labour Relations Board)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
639 State immunity — Jurisdictional immunity — General rule that foreign State immune unless exception to immunity applicable — Canada State Immunity Act 1985, Section 3(1) — Interpretation — Scope of State immunity codified in Act — Proceeding under Section 33(6)(b) of Labour Relations Code 1996 — Whether foreign State immune from jurisdiction of British Columbia Labour Relations Board — Whether Board exercising jurisdiction over foreign State — Whether doctrine of State immunity applicable — Whether act of State doctrine applicable — Evidence — Whether foreign State entitled to bar voluntary testimony by employees and former employees Consular relations — Treaties — Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, 1963 — Interpretation — Application — Incorporation of Vienna Convention by Foreign Missions and International Organizations Act 1991 — Proceeding under Section 33(6)(b) of Labour Relations Code 1996 — Voluntary testimony by former consular employees of foreign State in respect of their official functions without consent of that State — Absence of waiver of immunities by foreign State — Admissibility of testimony — Whether issue moot on appeal — The law of Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.074 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".