MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769826028 · doi:10.1113/jp275001

Acute intermittent hypoxia with concurrent hypercapnia evokes P2X and TRPV1 receptor‐dependent sensory long‐term facilitation in naïve carotid bodies

2017· article· en· W2769826028 on OpenAlexafffund
Arijit Roy, Melissa M.J. Farnham, Fatemeh Derakhshan, Paul M. Pilowsky, Richard J. A. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTRPV1Peripheral chemoreceptorsCarotid bodySensory systemHypoxia (environmental)Internal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineGlomus cellCapsaicinIntermittent hypoxiaChemoreceptorReceptorNeuroscienceAnesthesiaTransient receptor potential channelChemistryBiologyElectrophysiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key points Activity‐dependent plasticity can be induced in carotid body (CB) chemosensory afferents without chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH) preconditioning by acute intermittent hypoxia coincident with bouts of hypercapnia (AIH‐Hc). Several properties of this acute plasticity are shared with CIH‐dependent sensory long‐term facilitation (LTF) in that induction is dependent on 5‐HT, angiotensin II, protein kinase C and reactive oxygen species. Several properties differ from CIH‐dependent sensory LTF; H2O2 appears to play no part in induction, whereas maintenance requires purinergic P2X2/3 receptor activation and is dependent on transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) receptor sensitization. Because P2X2/3 and TRPV1 receptors are located in carotid sinus nerve (CSN) terminals but not presynaptic glomus cells, a primary site of the acute AIH‐Hc induced sensory LTF appears to be postsynaptic. Our results obtained in vivo suggest a role for TRPV1‐dependent CB activity in acute sympathetic LTF. We propose that P2X‐TRPV1‐receptor‐dependent sensory LTF may constitute an important early mechanism linking sleep apnoea with hypertension and/or cardiovascular disease. Abstract Apnoeas constitute an acute existential threat to neonates and adults. In large part, this threat is detected by the carotid bodies, which are the primary peripheral chemoreceptors, and is combatted by arousal and acute cardiorespiratory responses, including increased sympathetic output. Similar responses occur with repeated apnoeas but they continue beyond the last apnoea and can persist for hours [i.e. ventilatory and sympathetic long‐term facilitation (LTF)]. These long‐term effects may be adaptive during acute episodic apnoea, although they may prolong hypertension causing chronic cardiovascular impairment. We report a novel mechanism of acute carotid body (CB) plasticity (sensory LTF) induced by repeated apnoea‐like stimuli [i.e. acute intermittent hypoxia coincident with bouts of hypercapnia (AIH‐Hc)]. This plasticity did not require chronic intermittent hypoxia preconditioning, was dependent on P2X receptors and protein kinase C, and involved heat‐sensitive transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) receptors. Reactive oxygen species (O2·¯) were involved in initiating plasticity only; no evidence was found for H2O2 involvement. Angiotensin II and 5‐HT receptor antagonists, losartan and ketanserin, severely reduced CB responses to individual hypoxic‐hypercapnic challenges and prevented the induction of sensory LTF but, if applied after AIH‐Hc, failed to reduce plasticity‐associated activity. Conversely, TRPV1 receptor antagonism had no effect on responses to individual hypoxic‐hypercapnic challenges but reduced plasticity‐associated activity by ∼50%. Further, TRPV1 receptor antagonism in vivo reduced sympathetic LTF caused by AIH‐Hc, although only if the CBs were functional. These data demonstrate a new mechanism of CB plasticity and suggest P2X‐TRPV1‐dependent sensory LTF as a novel target for pharmacological intervention in some forms of neurogenic hypertension associated with recurrent apnoeas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207