MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769843710 · doi:10.1109/wimob.2017.8115747

Fine-grained access provisioning via joint gateway selection and flow routing on SDN-aware Wi-Fi mesh networks

2017· article· en· W2769843710 on OpenAlexafffund
Dawood Sajjadi, Rukhsana Ruby, Maryam Tanha, Jianping Pan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkWireless mesh networkProvisioningDistributed computingSoftware-defined networkingDefault gatewayKey (lock)Wireless networkWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, dramatic growth of mobile data traffic has left the operators no choice but to consider Wi-Fi networks as an economic complementary solution. To achieve this, WLANs require to adopt some of the key features of carrier-grade operators, such as centralized resource management. As an emerging paradigm, Software Defined Networking (SDN) can be used to provide salient centralized network solutions for Wi-Fi infrastructures. In fact, applying SDN to different wireless platforms, e.g., Wi-Fi Mesh Networks (WMNs), brings unprecedented opportunities to improve the network performance by employing more sophisticated algorithms at SDN controllers. Moreover, it should be noted that traffic engineering over WMNs incorporates tightly correlated steps including association control, gateway selection and flow routing which are individually NP-hard problems. In this paper, we present an agile and fine-grained access provisioning solution via bridging the cellular and Wi-Fi technologies that empowers us to address the users demand by steering data flows on different tiers of WMNs. In contrast to the prior work, we present a detailed unified formulation for joint gateway selection and flow routing in Multi-Channel Multi-Radio (MCMR) WMNs that considers the key attributes of wireless networks. The functionality of the presented solution is evaluated through various experiments with extensive numerical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207