MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769848373

Effects of Novel Dog Exposure on College Students' Stress Prior to Examination

2017· article· en· W2769848373 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sylvia McDonald, Evan P. McDonald, Allen H. Roberts

Bibliographic record

VenueNorth American journal of psychology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHuman-Animal Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyTest anxietyPsychologyCognitive restructuringTest (biology)Clinical psychologyLonelinessDepression (economics)MeditationCognitionPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Higher education strives to provoke thinking, learning, and comprehensive success in its students. Quizzes and exams are often used to monitor and assess whether these goals have been reached but have also been shown to evoke test anxiety in students (Hembree, 1998). Test anxiety is a psychological construct that pairs with a student's concerns about the negative consequence of performing poorly and/or failing a test (Chapell, Blanding, Silverstein, Takahashi, Newman, Gubi, & McCann, 2005; Zeidner, 1998). A moderate level of test anxiety can be beneficial for success in academic achievement, but when the anxiety becomes excessive, academic assessment performance significantly decreases (Siddiqui & Rehman, 2014). Research has attempted to find cognitive behavioral practices to reduce test anxiety, including religious activities, exercise, breathing techniques, meditation, and cognitive restructuring. Likewise, trained therapy dogs have also been used to alleviate stress for college students linked to test anxiety (Barker, Barker, McCain, & Schubert, 2016). Von Bergen (2015) reported that dogs have been used for decades on campus for those requiring guide dogs or other service animals. Folse, Minder, Aycock, and Santana (1994) reported that trained therapy dogs were first introduced to American campuses and universities in the 1990s to accompany students diagnosed with depression. The self reported results of having therapy dogs with them on campus were beneficial in relieving depression symptoms. Recently, students diagnosed with depression, anxiety, and autism spectrum disorders have begun to petition colleges to allow trained therapy dogs on campuses to alleviate stress, loneliness, depression, and/or anxiety (Von Bergen, 2015). Bell (2013) highlighted that in American universities there was a strong correlation between student stress and the benefits of exposure to therapy dogs, causing some to actually begin implementation of programs whereby students can regularly engage with a therapy dog. Some universities have allowed students to check out dogs from their library with a self-reported 95% of students believing it to be an effective means for stress reduction (Jalongo & McDevitt, 2015). Daltry and Meher (2015) emphasized that trained therapy dogs on campuses have demonstrated to be particularly beneficial in alleviating stress and providing psychological comfort to university students. This stress can be caused by various situations, including test anxiety. Barker et al. (2016) showed that exposure to therapy dogs before exams reduced self-reported psychological test anxiety in college students. According to Dell, et al. (2015) nearly half of all 98 Canadian universities offer therapy dog programs during examination periods. Service and therapy dogs are becoming more prevalent in a variety of settings. Hall, Turner and Mills (2017) highlighted that working service dogs are professionally trained and screened and provided clearance in public places by the Americans with Disabilities Act. This mandates that they be extensively trained and insured. Bowers (2013) also reported that therapy dogs must be professionally trained and it is recommended that an accredited training organization perform that training. This usually consists of obedience classes as well as professional dog training, costing thousands of dollars. Considering this, trained therapy dogs can be inaccessible for small, private universities in North America. This can be due to limited ownership budget, training/acquiring expense, or rural locations with limited availability of therapy dogs to remote areas. To confront this problem, our purpose was to examine whether exposure to novel dogs, rather than therapy dogs, also caused a reduction in stress levels. According to Carlson, Speca, Faris, and Patel (2007), blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) is positively correlated to stress. Vormbrock and Grossberg (1988) assessed heart rate and blood pressure as a measure of stress in college students. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorth American journal of psychologySame topicHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207