MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769851067

Review of Jonathan R Wynn’s 2011 The Tour guide. Walking and talking New York

2015· article· en· W2769851067 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransfers · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryAgency (philosophy)IndigenousHumanityMetisPortugueseAnthropologySociologySocial sciencePolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BOOK REVIEWS Indigenous Agency and European Science: Exploring the Emergence of “Race” Across Seas and Centuries Bronwen Douglas, Science, Voyages, and Encounters in Oceania, 1511– 1850 (Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave, 2014), 384 pp., 41 illustrations, £70 In Science, Voyages, and Encounters in Oceania, 1511–1850, Bronwen Doug- las brings together twenty years of research in an ambitious, stimulating, and engaging history. Th e book highlights the simultaneous and competing infl u- ences of indigenous agency, experiences in the fi eld, and metropolitan theories about human diversity on the representations of Oceanic peoples produced by European voyagers. It also traces how European understandings of humanity were constructed via the circulation of knowledge between imperial centers and peripheries and the accumulation of knowledge from one encounter or voyage to another. Th e gradual emergence of the “science of race,” Douglas reveals, was aff ected by the regular movement of people and the constant ex- change, accrual, and testing of their knowledge over space and time. Th is history is told chronologically and in two parts. Beginning in the six- teenth century with so-called Indians, Negroes, and Savages in Terra Aus- tralis, the fi rst part takes the reader through three stages—“Before Races,” “Towards Races,” and “Seeing Races”—from Portuguese, Spanish, and Dutch exploration to British and French scientifi c expeditions, concluding at th e turn of the nineteenth century. In Douglas’s own terms, this fi rst part consti- tutes a “lexico-semantic history and an ethnohistory of ‘not race’” (33). In the second part, the scope narrows as Douglas concentrates on a series of French maritime expeditions that, unlike their predecessors, involved only naval staff —no civilian naturalists. Th ey experienced Oceanic encounters and pro- duced textual and visual representations of humanity in a climate of “harden- ing racial values and imperial rivalry in the metropole” and amid an array of “confl icting imperatives”—personal, offi cial, and experiential (34). Despite its breadth, this history is thorough and scholarly. Douglas smoothly combines ethnohistory and the history of science, acknowledges the complexities of the historical record by considering, for example, the diff erences between textual and visual genres, and traces the shifting moods of her subjects by noting, for instance, the patterns and connotations of their language. Th e book’s vibrant cover image provides an engaging and appropriate entry to this complex history. Truly a “graphic narrative” (33), it depicts the meeting between a boatload of voyagers from the Astrolabe and several men Transfers 5(2), Summer 2015: 143–164 doi: 10.3167/TRANS.2015.050212 ISSN 2045-4813 (Print) ISSN 2045-4821 (Online)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it