MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W276985235 · doi:10.1109/twc.2008.060642

Robust switching blind equalizer for wireless cognitive receivers

2008· article· en· W276985235 on OpenAlexaff
Hsiao‐Chun Wu, Yiyan Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEqualizerWirelessCognitive radioAdaptive equalizerComputer networkElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kurtosis minimization has been applied for the existing blind equalization schemes but the corresponding optimization procedures are very sensitive to the channel conditions and the initial conditions. In this paper, we introduce a new cognitive receiver front-end, which includes a novel switching blind equalizer and an automatic modulation classifier. We design a switching criterion based on the kurtosis/normalized moment ratio threshold to select the better signal between the raw data and the equalized sequence. Simulations demonstrate that our proposed robust switching blind equalization scheme can significantly outperform the existing blind equalizer and would not degrade the subsequent modulation classification accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207