MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769852498 · doi:10.1109/tte.2017.2778149

Emulation of a Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Generator in Real-Time Using Power Hardware-in-the-Loop

2017· article· en· W2769852498 on OpenAlexafffund
R. Sudharshan Kaarthik, K. S. Amitkumar, Pragasen Pillay

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPermanent magnet synchronous generatorHardware-in-the-loop simulationEmulationReal Time Digital SimulatorTransient (computer programming)EngineeringVoltageConvertersComputer sciencePower (physics)Electric power systemAutomotive engineeringElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringControl engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permanent-magnet synchronous generators (PMSGs) are used in several applications of traction electrification such as power supplies for auxiliary systems and vehicle on-board range-extenders. In this paper, a PMSG is emulated using power hardware in-the-loop. This emulation scheme provides a method to eliminate risks and costs associated with the testing, prototyping, and validation of controllers for power converters and other parts of the traction system. The proposed scheme can be used for testing of motor drives' different parameters, thereby enabling the testing of a variety of electrical machine drives where the machine prototype is unavailable. The voltage output of the proposed emulator system replicates the voltage generated within the real-time model. The terminal voltage from the real-time model depends on the load connected to the emulator terminals; the current drawn from the emulator output terminals is sensed and fed back to enable the emulator to replicate the PMSG characteristics in steady state and transients. The performance of the system for nonlinear loads, such as a rectifier with a capacitor filter and transient conditions, is also experimentally verified and presented along with validation against a physical PMSG coupled to a dynamometer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Transportation ElectrificationSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207