MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W276985660

Telling Time: Essays of a Visionary Filmmaker

2005· article· en· W276985660 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Brett Kashmere

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFilm directorLiteratureCriticismPoetryArtAestheticsArt historyPhilosophyMovie theater
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TELLING TIME: ESSAYS OF A VISIONARY FILMMAKER Edited by Bruce McPherson Kingston, NY: Documentext, McPherson and Company, 2003, 144 pp. When Stan Brakhage passed away in March 2003, not only did the international avant-garde lose a groundbreaking artist, magisterial teller of tales, and esteemed public presence; it also lost an original, audacious and insightful theoretician. twenty-six pieces collected in Telling Time: Essays of a Visionary Filmmaker, first printed in the Toronto quarterly, Musicworks between 1989 and 1999, establish Brakhage's place among the most elastic minds of his generation. Similarly at ease discussing Russian poetry, romantic love, visual perception, child psychology, human cognition, and religious belief as he is debating aesthetic or cinematic issues, Brakhage's essays spark from stream-of-consciousness synapses, sudden insights culled from a lifetime of voracious reading, attentive reflection, and piercing observation. entries in Telling Time comprise Brakhage's most mature writing, but they continue to maintain the playful slips of language and leaps of faith that distinguish earlier works such as Metaphors on Vision (1963), Biographies (1977), and at Wit's End (1989). Devoid of footnotes and academic jargon, but replete with puns, intentional misspellings, humorous asides, conceptual enjambments, run on sentences and non-sequiturs, his speculative criticism is akin to a psycho-geographical derive. Suggesting thought-in-motion (unselfconscious, deliberate thinking], these freshly buoyant essays express the organic, uneven now-ness of his more intuitive film compositions. Given his lifelong study of modem classical music, the pronounced, asymmetrical rhythm of Brakhage's writing is apt. Music, he says, served as inspiration for both his photographic and his actual editing orders even as his creative philosophies were becoming silently oriented. As Bruce McPherson points out in his Editor's Note, Brakhage's column (titled Time...on dit) arose as an exploration of film and music's analogous relationship, and was intended for Musicworks' specialized readership. As time-based modes of expression, both music and film depend on rhythm for unity, development and coherence. Film and Music are continuity Arts, he writes. They share 'kin senses of rhythm and tempo, as well as corollary aesthetics with respect to 'tone.' But, as McPherson observes, Brakhage quickly departed from his investigation of film and music parallels to explore a vast array of cultural, scientific and philosophical genres, drawing links between poetry, painting, astronomy, aesthetics, and phenomenology. An unwavering fascination with rhythm, however, permeates all of these interests. On the first page of the volume's initial essay, About Time, Brakhage introduces Charles Olson's famous dictum, rhythm is image./ Of image is knowing/ And of knowing there is a construct. These three lines form a wellspring for many subsequent departures, such as the book's final, brief conjecture on vision, memory and perception. By juxtaposing open- and closed-eye descriptions of falling leaves, Brakhage illustrates how representational likeness is only one means for recounting a familiar visual scenario. He argues that we must forget how we are trained to see (i.e. the normative perspective derived from Renaissance art) in order to arrive at a fuller, more complex engagement with the natural world. In his example, the intertwined swirl of imagined, remembered, open-eye and hypnagogic images are inseparable components of heightened perception. He writes, The Leaf Ritual paradigm, which began this essay, can be read, then, as a verbal parable which attempts to explicate the results of such visual loss as is affiliated with the development of speech, as well as experienced as a lament composed of rhythms in memoriam. Here, Brakhage's oddly formed, prolix prose unintentionally points up the line dividing perception and description, while simultaneously confounding figurative associations. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207