MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2769857420

La inversión extranjera directa y su incidencia en la balanza comercial del Ecuador en los años 2000-2014

2017· dissertation· es· W2769857420 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Condoy Valarezo, Ángel David

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBusiness, Innovation, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ante el proceso de globalizacion que vive el mundo, nuestro pais se ve obligado al mejoramiento de su nivel de competitividad, buscando mayores ingresos economicos, la inversion extranjera directa (IDE) es una de las alternativas; la IED atrae la transferencia de tecnologia y conocimientos, por lo que resulta necesario adecuadas politicas que incentiven esta actividad, ante la dificil situacion economica financiera del pais. La presente investigacion tiene como finalidad analizar la IED y su incidencia en la balanza comercial del Ecuador en los anos 2000-2014. En este periodo se realiza un diagnostico del comportamiento de la IED en el pais y se establecen los resultados de la balanza comercial. Como resultado principal de la investigacion se obtuvo que la IED ha influido positivamente en la balanza comercial del Ecuador en el periodo del 2000-2014, debido a que los flujos de capitales de la IED, contribuyen a la formacion bruta de capital fijo, proveniente especialmente de China, Espana, Canada, Brasil y Mexico, que han ubicado sus capitales fundamentalmente en las actividades de explotacion de minas y canteras.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBusiness, Innovation, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207