La inversión extranjera directa y su incidencia en la balanza comercial del Ecuador en los años 2000-2014
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ante el proceso de globalizacion que vive el mundo, nuestro pais se ve obligado al mejoramiento de su nivel de competitividad, buscando mayores ingresos economicos, la inversion extranjera directa (IDE) es una de las alternativas; la IED atrae la transferencia de tecnologia y conocimientos, por lo que resulta necesario adecuadas politicas que incentiven esta actividad, ante la dificil situacion economica financiera del pais. La presente investigacion tiene como finalidad analizar la IED y su incidencia en la balanza comercial del Ecuador en los anos 2000-2014. En este periodo se realiza un diagnostico del comportamiento de la IED en el pais y se establecen los resultados de la balanza comercial. Como resultado principal de la investigacion se obtuvo que la IED ha influido positivamente en la balanza comercial del Ecuador en el periodo del 2000-2014, debido a que los flujos de capitales de la IED, contribuyen a la formacion bruta de capital fijo, proveniente especialmente de China, Espana, Canada, Brasil y Mexico, que han ubicado sus capitales fundamentalmente en las actividades de explotacion de minas y canteras.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".