MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 21042: Cardiovascular Risk Stratification Using Off-the-Shelf Wearables and a Multi-Task Deep Learning Algorithm

2017· article· en· W2770013197 on OpenAlex
Geoffrey H. Tison, Avesh C Singh, Daniel A Ohashi, Johnson Hsieh, Brandon Ballinger, Jeffrey E. Olgin, Gregory M. Marcus, Mark J. Pletcher

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSleep apneaLogistic regressionDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineCardiologyObstructive sleep apneaHeart rateApneaPhysical therapyMachine learningBlood pressureEndocrinologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate whether a novel deep neural network (DNN) can predict cardiovascular risk factors from off-the-shelf wearables with a photoplethysmographic (PPG) heart rate sensor and accelerometer. Longitudinal heart rate variability and activity patterns have previously been associated with incident hypertension, diabetes, and sleep apnea, conditions which are frequently undiagnosed. Methods: Health eHeart, an IRB-approved UCSF study, enrolled 6,115 active users of the Cardiogram app for Apple Watch. Heart rate and step counts were collected for a period of 1 to 53 weeks (mean=8.9). Data from 70% of participants (33,628 person-weeks of data) was used to train a semi-supervised, multi-task DNN with both convolutional and recurrent layers to simultaneously predict prevalent hypertension, sleep apnea, and diabetes. Test performance characteristics were estimated using the remaining 30% of participants. Results: Mean age was 42.3 ± 12.1, 69% male. 2,230 (36.5%) of participants had hypertension, 1,016 (16.6%) had sleep apnea, and 462 (7.6%) had diabetes. In the validation set, the DNN outperformed a baseline logistic regression model incorporating age, sex, and beta blocker use, predicting prevalent hypertension with a c-statistic of 0.819 (95% CI 0.76-0.88; with an optimal operating point yielding 84.8% sensitivity and 63.6% specificity) vs a baseline c-statistic of 0.682 (95% CI 0.60-0.76), and prevalent sleep apnea with a c-statistic of 0.902 (95% CI 0.85-0.95; with an optimal operating point yielding 90.4% sensitivity and 59.8% specificity) vs a baseline c-statistic of 0.459 (95% CI 0.39-0.53). Results were not statistically significant for diabetes. Conclusions: Our DNN demonstrates surprisingly good prediction of hypertension and sleep apnea given that its only inputs are heart rate and step count. Whether such DNNs can provide durable and portable predictions for these conditions in other study samples is worth pursuing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it