MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770015556 · doi:10.1121/1.5014517

Semi-analytical finite-element based method for inverse characterization of cortical bone using low-frequency guided waves

2017· article· en· W2770015556 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Pereira, Julio Fernandes, Pierre Bélanger

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodCortical boneInverseComputer scienceInverse problemLow frequencyCurvatureInversion (geology)ComputationExperimental dataAlgorithmAcousticsMathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsGeometryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Axial transmission research has demonstrated that low-frequency ultrasonic guided waves are sensitive to changes in the intracortical bone, which is of interest since the resorption in the endosteal region is associated to early-stage osteoporosis. Current methods rely on inversion schemes used to match experimental data with the theoretical data obtained from simplified models. However, due to the importance of the cross-sectional curvature of the cortical bone at low-frequency (e.g., <200 kHz), the implementation of a more elaborate model remains an open issue. Thus, the aim of this paper is to introduce a semi-analytical finite-element (SAFE) model to be used along with a genetic algorithm for the inverse characterization of cortical bone. Our proposal is to validate an inverse scheme using laboratory-controlled measurements on bone-mimicking phantoms at low frequency. An arbitrary cross-sectional geometry, instead of a plate or cylinder simplification, was implemented. Despite a computationally expensive SAFE routine, the results show that the model outputs estimated by the genetic algorithm are in good agreement with the reference values obtained by µCT images. The possibility of implementing parallel computation using graphics processing units in order to increase the level of complexity of the SAFE model may now be investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207