Analysis of Spounaviruses as a Case Study for the Overdue Reclassification of Tailed Bacteriophages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT It is almost a cliché that tailed bacteriophages of the order Caudovirales are the most abundant and diverse viruses in the world. Yet, their taxonomy still consists of a single order with just three families: Myoviridae , Siphoviridae , and Podoviridae . Thousands of newly discovered phage genomes have recently challenged this morphology-based classification, revealing that tailed bacteriophages are genomically even more diverse than once thought. Here, we evaluate a range of methods for bacteriophage taxonomy by using a particularly challenging group as an example, the Bacillus phage SPO1-related viruses of the myovirid subfamily Spounavirinae . Exhaustive phylogenetic and phylogenomic analyses indicate that the spounavirins are consistent with the taxonomic rank of family and should be divided into at least five subfamilies. This work is a case study for virus genomic taxonomy and the first step in an impending massive reorganization of the tailed bacteriophage taxonomy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".