MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770087930 · doi:10.1190/tle21050495.1

Reviews

2002· article· en· W2770087930 on OpenAlexaff
John Woodside, William R. Green, Sven Treitel, David C. Bartel, Andrey Bakulin, Larry Lines, Ronald Green, Lanbo Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsCalgary Construction AssociationCapilano University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIlyaArt historyHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamics of fluidized particles, by Roy Jackson. ISBN 0-521-78122-1. Cambridge, 2000. 339 pp. $69.95 The measurement of time: Time, frequency, and the atomic clock, by Claude Audoin and Bernard Guinot. ISBN 0-521-80080-30, Cambridge, 2001, 335 pp. $110 Tripping the ballerina, by Paul Ware. ISBN 0-7388-6754-3. Xlibris, 2001. 265 pp. $16. The Seismic Wavefield, Volume 1: Introduction and Theoretical Development, by Brian L. N. Kennett, ISBN 0 521 80945 2 (hardback) and ISBN 0 521 00663 (paperback), Cambridge, 370 pp., $100 (hardback), $35.95 (paperback). Mantle plumes and their record in earth history, K. C. Condie. ISBN 0-521-80604-6 (hardback), 0-521-01472-7 (paperback). Cambridge, 2001, 306 pp.,$110 (hardback), $39.95 (paperback) Seismic signatures and analysis of reflection data in anisotropic media, (Handbook of Geophysical Exploration 29) by Ilya Tsvankin. ISBN 0-08-043649-8. Pergamon Press (Elsevier Science), 2001. 454 pp. $156.50 Rock magnetism: Fundamentals and frontiers by David J. Dunlap and Ozden Ozdemir. ISBN Number: 0-512-00098-x, (paperback edition; hardcover published in 1997) Cambridge, 2001, 573 pp., $49.95 Numerical simulation of reactive flow, 2nd Edition, by Elaine S. Oran and Jay P. Boris. ISBN 0-521-58175-3 Cambridge, 2001, 529 pp. $90

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Leading EdgeSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207