MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770108463 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v10n1p32

Numerical Solution for Solving System of Fuzzy Nonlinear Integral Equation by Using Modified Decomposition Method

2017· article· en· W2770108463 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alan Jalal Abdulqader

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFuzzy Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsConvergence (economics)Numerical analysisNonlinear systemFuzzy logicScheme (mathematics)Integral equationApplied mathematicsDecomposition method (queueing theory)Mathematical optimizationMathematical analysisComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we intend to offer system of fuzzy nonlinear integral equation also numerical scheme to solve. by using the new and fast technique to solve our problem. we try to discuss some numerical aspects such as convergence and error analysis. Finally, accuracy and applicability of the proposed methods are carried out along with comparisons using some numerical examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.307
GPT teacher head0.504
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicFuzzy Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207