Quand le droit international des droits de l'Homme et le droit canadien des réfugiés LGBTQ+ convergent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse les Principes directeurs no 9 du Haut Commissariat des Nations Unies aux réfugiés sur les Demandes de statut de réfugié fondées sur l'orientation sexuelle et/ou l'identité de genre dans le contexte de l'article 1A (2) de la Convention de 1951 et/ou de son Protocole de 1967 relatifs au statut de réfugiés ainsi que les nouvelles Directives numéro 9 du président concernant les audiences de la Commission de l'immigration et du statut de réfugié du Canada faisant intervenir une personne appartenant à une minorité sexuelle ou à une minorité de genre. Il conclut à une convergence du droit canadien et du droit international des droits de l'homme en matière de détermination du statut de réfugié pour les personnes LGBTQ+.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".