MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770333792 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781108159807.004

Amaratunga <i>v.</i> Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization

2017· article· en· W2770333792 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Law Reports · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInternational Maritime Law Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrievanceInternational Covenant on Civil and Political RightsPolitical scienceHuman rightsLawCustomary international lawInternational lawConventionPublic international lawInternational human rights lawRight to property

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

618 International organizations — Immunities — Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization — Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Privileges and Immunities Order, Section 3(1) — Absolute and limited immunities — Immunities and privileges as “required” for “performance of functions” — Meaning of “required” — Functions of international organizations — Whether lack of forum to air grievance defeating immunity — Labour relations — Whether immunity extending to internal Staff Rules Relationship of international law and municipal law — Human rights — Immunities — 1985 Canadian Bill of Rights, Section 2(e) — Right to a fair hearing — Privileges and Immunities (International Organizations) Act 1985 — Foreign Missions and International Organizations Act 1991 — Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Privileges and Immunities Order Treaties — Immunities — International organizations — Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, 1946 — International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, Article 14 — Right to a fair hearing — Procedural rights versus substantive rights — Whether right to make a claim — The law of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Law ReportsSame topicInternational Maritime Law IssuesFrench-language works237,207