Amaratunga <i>v.</i> Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
618 International organizations — Immunities — Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization — Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Privileges and Immunities Order, Section 3(1) — Absolute and limited immunities — Immunities and privileges as “required” for “performance of functions” — Meaning of “required” — Functions of international organizations — Whether lack of forum to air grievance defeating immunity — Labour relations — Whether immunity extending to internal Staff Rules Relationship of international law and municipal law — Human rights — Immunities — 1985 Canadian Bill of Rights, Section 2(e) — Right to a fair hearing — Privileges and Immunities (International Organizations) Act 1985 — Foreign Missions and International Organizations Act 1991 — Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Privileges and Immunities Order Treaties — Immunities — International organizations — Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, 1946 — International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, Article 14 — Right to a fair hearing — Procedural rights versus substantive rights — Whether right to make a claim — The law of Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".