MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770451805 · doi:10.2166/aqua.2017.058

The comparison of discrete ordinate and Monte Carlo methods in solving of the radiation transfer equations in a heterogenous reactor

2017· article· en· W2770451805 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gholamreza Asadollahfardi, Mojtaba Noori, Mohsen Asadi, M. Taherioun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Supply Research and Technology—AQUA · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconMonte Carlo methodComputer scienceInformation retrievalLibrary scienceOperations researchEngineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| November 27 2017 The comparison of discrete ordinate and Monte Carlo methods in solving of the radiation transfer equations in a heterogenous reactor G. Asadollahfardi; G. Asadollahfardi 1Civil Engineering Department, Kharazmi University, Tehran 15719-14911, Iran E-mail: asadollahfardi@yahoo.com Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar M. Noori; M. Noori 1Civil Engineering Department, Kharazmi University, Tehran 15719-14911, Iran Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar M. Asadi; M. Asadi 2Engineering Department, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon S7N 5A9, Canada Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar M. Taherioun M. Taherioun 3Civil Engineering Department, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua (2018) 67 (1): 109–118. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2017.058 Article history Received: March 10 2017 Accepted: October 16 2017 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Permissions Search Site Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsThis Journal Search Advanced Search Citation G. Asadollahfardi, M. Noori, M. Asadi, M. Taherioun; The comparison of discrete ordinate and Monte Carlo methods in solving of the radiation transfer equations in a heterogenous reactor. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua 1 February 2018; 67 (1): 109–118. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2017.058 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Abstract Photoreactor applications in water and wastewater treatment has been increased in recent years. The simulation of radiation distribution inside the reactors allows the optimization of its operation. The radiation transfer equation (RTE) illustrates the field radiation. We applied the discrete ordinate (DO) method to solve the RTE and computed the local volumetric rate of energy absorption (LVREA) in a photoreactor, consisting of a Ultra Violet (UV) lamp and titanium dioxide Degussa P25 (TiO2 DP 25) catalyst. First, GAMBIT 2.4.6 was employed to model the reactor in three dimensions. The simulation of the radiation distribution was carried out using FLUENT 14.5 software in the framework of a multiple point source summation (MPSS) model. The robustness of the DO approach was assessed by comparing with the Monte Carlo (MC) method and experimental data. The coefficient of determination (R2) and index of agreement (IA) of DO and experimental data were 0.95 and 0.93, respectively. The DO and MC had a good convergence in the low concentrations of TiO2 DP 25. In the concentrations between 0.03 g/l to 0.15 g/l, the difference with experimental data increased. In the concentration of 0.15 g/l, and beyond, the both methods and experimental data were in a good agreement. discrete ordinate (DO) method, Monte Carlo (MC) method, photoreactor, radiation transfer equation (RTE), ultraviolet (UV) lamp © IWA Publishing 2018 You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Supply Research and Technology—AQUASame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207