La santé, élément commun des politiques publiques ? L’expérience canadienne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mené par le CRIR et ses partenaires, le projet Laboratoire Vivant de Réadaptation, RehabMaLL, collabore à la création d’un environnement facilitant la participation et l’inclusion des personnes de tous âges, particulièrement de celles vivant avec des incapacités physiques, dans un centre commercial du centre-ville de Montréal. Hormis le partenaire principal, FPI COMINAR, propriétaire du centre commercial, le projet inclut des milieux communautaires et associatifs, cliniques, le privé, ainsi que des chercheurs et des industriels locaux, nationaux et internationaux. Cette initiative découle de l’engagement actif et de la synergie entre des chercheurs et des partenaires qui se sont donné pour but de faire disparaître les obstacles créés par des environnements physiques et sociaux discriminants. Cette transformation se réalise au travers de solutions innovantes et de stratégies visant la réduction des inégalités et la promotion de l’accessibilité, du bien-être et, par conséquent, de la santé des Québécois.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".