MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770539879 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b10175

Parameterization of Palmitoylated Cysteine, Farnesylated Cysteine, Geranylgeranylated Cysteine, and Myristoylated Glycine for the Martini Force Field

2017· article· en· W2770539879 on OpenAlexafffund
Yoav Atsmon‐Raz, D. Peter Tieleman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCysteineGlycineMyristoylationChemistryBiochemistryCell biologyBiologyAmino acidPhosphorylationEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peripheral membrane proteins go through various post-translational modifications that covalently bind fatty acid tails to specific amino acids. These post-translational modifications significantly alter the lipophilicity of the modified proteins and allow them to anchor to biological membranes. Over 1000 different proteins have been identified to date that require such membrane-protein interactions to carry out their biological functions, including members of the Src and Ras superfamilies that play key roles in cell signaling and carcinogenesis. We have used all-atom simulations with the CHARMM36 force field to parameterize four of the most common post-translational modifications for the Martini 2.2 force field: palmitoylated cysteine, farnesylated cysteine, geranylgeranylated cysteine, and myristoylated glycine. The parameters reproduce the key features of clusters of configurations of the different anchors in lipid membranes as well as the water-octanol partitioning free energies of the anchors, which are crucial for the correct reproduction of the expected biophysical behavior of peripheral membrane proteins at the membrane-water interface. Implementation in existing Martini setup tools facilitates the use of the new parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207