Increasing Bandwidth Efficiency in Multibeam Satellite Systems under Interference Limited Condition Using Overlay Coding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate the overlay coding scheme as the capacity achieving multi user detection (MUD) technique, i.e., transmitting over non-orthogonal channels, in forward link in multi-beam satellite systems with dense frequency reuse. The classic overlay coding scheme, uses the strongest co- channel interference (CCI) as extra source of information. The data intended for the target user is shared between the adjacent beams. The involved beams cooperate in jointly transmitting the data to the target user at the same time. Thus, the target user receives a signal containing the addition of the two data streams, i.e., as in a multiple access channel (MAC). Employing successive interference cancellation (SIC), both data could be recovered, resulting in higher throughput. However, in order to employ overlay coding in multibeam satellite systems, optimization strategies should be taken into consideration. Hence, we propose our advanced optimized overlay coding scheme, which considerably increases the spectral efficiency. We devise an information theoretic framework to compare different strategies by evaluating the aggregate data rate in the beam of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".