MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770751706 · doi:10.32316/hse/rhe.v29i2.4507

From Territory to Human Resources: A History of Colonial Adult Education in the Central Arctic

2017· article· en· W2770751706 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Scott McLean

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducation · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of TorontoGovernment of CanadaArctic Institute of North AmericaNorsk PolarinstituttSmithsonian Institution
KeywordsScholarshipEthnologyAdult educationArcticPolitical scienceColonialismHuman settlementEconomic growthGeographySociologyArchaeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article narrates the history of state-organized adult education in the Central Arctic (Kitikmeot region) from the 1950s through the early 1990s. Prior to 1960, little formal adult education was delivered in the region, as relationships between Inuit and Euro-Canadians centred on the exchange of fox furs for external products. In the 1960s and 1970s, adult programs focused on housing, education, literacy, and home management, teaching groups of Inuit how to live in the permanent settlements that had recently been constructed by the federal government. In the 1980s, adult programs focused on employment preparation and life skills, moulding individual Inuit into employable citizens. This article addresses an important silence in existing scholarship regarding Canadian educational history, and sheds light upon the evolving priorities of Euro-Canadian colonizers in the Arctic; whether for purposes of territorial sovereignty or human resource development, adult education served as an important medium for the communication of colonial messages.RésuméCet article raconte l’histoire de l’éducation aux adultes organisée par l’État dans l’Arctique central (région de Kitikmeot), depuis les années 1950 jusqu’au début des années 1990. Avant 1960, peu de programmes d’éducation aux adultes étaient offerts dans la région, puisque les relations entre Inuits et Euro-Canadiens étaient alors centrées sur l’échange de fourrures de renard contre des produits venant de l’extérieur. Dans les années 1960 et 1970, les programmes pour adultes se sont concentrés sur le logement, l’éducation, l’alphabétisation et l’économie familiale, enseignant aux Inuits comment vivre dans les établissements permanents récemment construits par le gouvernement fédéral. Dans les années 1980, les programmes pour adultes se sont concentrés sur la préparation à l’emploi et les compétences de la vie quotidienne, façonnant les individus Inuits en citoyens aptes à l’emploi. Cet article comble un manque important dans la littérature sur l’histoire de l’éducation canadienne, et met en lumière l’évolution des priorités des colonisateurs Euro-Canadiens dans l’Arctique. Que ce soit à des fins de souveraineté territoriale ou de développement des ressources humaines, l’éducation aux adultes a servi comme un important moyen de communication des messages coloniaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.014
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducationSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207