MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770829236 · doi:10.1115/dscc2017-5279

Design and Analysis of a Pose Estimator for Quadrotor MAVs With Modified Dynamics and Range Measurements

2017· article· en· W2770829236 on OpenAlexaff
Eranga Fernando, George K. I. Mann, Oscar De Silva, Raymond G. Gosine

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorRange (aeronautics)Extended Kalman filterKalman filterComputer sciencePosition (finance)AerodynamicsInertial frame of referenceInertial measurement unitControl theory (sociology)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematicsAerospace engineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design and analysis of a pose estimator for quadrotor micro aerial vehicles (MAVs). The proposed design uses the dynamic model of the quadrotor with aerodynamic effects and uses the extended Kalman filter (EKF) formulation for state estimation. Range measurements to known locations, inertial measurements and height measurements are used for the estimation task. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the performance of the estimator when navigating through a changing indoor setting. The study investigates the effect of changing number of rannge measurements, different geometrical arrangements of range sensors and changing availability of confident height information on the performance of the estimator. Performance of the estimator for each scenario is numerically analyzed. Finally a criteria is proposed for selecting the sensors, number of range measurements, geometric location of sensors which facilitates accurate position estimation using the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207