MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770836247 · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.7b00412

An Improved Whole-Cell Biosensor for the Discovery of Lignin-Transforming Enzymes in Functional Metagenomic Screens

2017· letter· en· W2770836247 on OpenAlexafffund
Joe C. H. Ho, Sandip V. Pawar, Steven Hallam, Vikramaditya G. Yadav

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Synthetic Biology · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiochemical and biochemical processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanada Foundation for InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsBiosensorSyringaldehydeLigninVanillinFosmidChemistryHigh-throughput screeningMetagenomicsBiotechnologyComputational biologyBiologyBiochemistryGeneOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The discovery and utilization of biocatalysts that selectively valorize lignocellulose is critical to the profitability of next-generation biorefineries. Here, we report the development of a refactored, whole-cell, GFP-based biosensor for high-throughput identification of biocatalysts that transform lignin into specialty chemicals from environmental DNA of uncultivable archaea and bacteria. The biosensor comprises the transcriptional regulator and promoter of the emrRAB operon of E. coli, and the configuration of the biosensor was tuned with the aid of mathematical model. The biosensor sensitively and selectively detects vanillin and syringaldehyde, and responds linearly over a wide detection range. We employed the biosensor to screen 42 520 fosmid clones comprising environmental DNA isolated from two coal beds and successfully identified 147 clones that transform hardwood kraft lignin to vanillin and syringaldehyde.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Synthetic BiologySame topicBiochemical and biochemical processesFrench-language works237,207