MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2770848627 · doi:10.1080/13229400.2017.1402805

Transnational familial strategies, social reproduction, and migration: Chinese immigrant women professionals in Canada

2017· article· en· W2770848627 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Guida Man, Elena Chou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Family Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsImmigrationProject commissioningReproductionPublishingSociologyGender studiesSocial reproductionPolitical scienceSocial scienceSocial capitalBiologyLawEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper fills a lacuna in the literature on gender, work, and migration by exploring the migration experience and familial arrangements of middle-class Mainland Chinese migrant women who were professionals in their home country. Informed by theoretical debates on social reproduction, and transnational migration frameworks, it explores how transnational migration is shaped by intersectional gender, race/ethnicity, and class processes, and demonstrates how these Chinese immigrant women utilized transnational familial arrangements as strategies for social reproduction. In doing so, the Mainland Chinese immigrant women professionals provide what they perceive as better opportunities for themselves and for their families. Our research starts with Chinese immigrant women’s individual articulations of their own migration trajectories, we then go further to examine how the women’s transmigration strategies are embedded in the context of the changing social, economic, political, and cultural processes in China and in Canada. In this paper, Mainland Chinese immigrant women’s motivations for immigrating to Canada; how migration shapes their experiences in Canada; as well as their transnational strategies for social reproduction are explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0240.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Family StudiesSame topicMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207