PEMAKNAAN MASYARAKAT PROMASAN TENTANG FUNGSI EKOLOGIS HUTAN DI WILAYAH GUNUNG UNGARAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Masyarakat yang tinggal disekitar hutan memiliki potensi yang besar dalam memanfaatkan hutan, memaknai hutan beserta fungsinya untuk pemenuhan kebutuhan hidupnya. Dusun Promasan merupakan Dusun terakhir di Lereng Gunung Ungaran yang terletak di Desa Ngesrepbalong, Kecamatan Limbangan, Kabupaten Kendal, Jawa Tengah. Dusun Promasan dikelilingi oleh kebun teh dengan latar belakang Gunung Ungaran dan hamparan hutan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pemaknaan masyarakat Dusun Promasan tentang fungsi ekologis hutan dan untuk mengetahui cara masyarakat Dusun Promasan memaknai hutan menurut sudut pandang masyarakatnya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah observasi, wawancara dan pengumpulan data sekunder. Analisis data dilakukan secara deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa masyarakat Dusun Promasan memaknai hutan berdasarkan fungsi ekologis namun tanpa adanya pengelolaan hutan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa masyarakat Dusun Promasan memiliki pengetahuan tentang sains yang masih rendah sehingga masyarakat dalam memaknai hutan hanya berlandaskan pada pengalaman masyarakat dalam memanfaatkan hutan untuk kebutuhan hidup sehari-sehari.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".